Thursday, December 31, 2009
Continuity and Change Were FTC Themes for 2009
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.
In a speech to attendees of the American Bar Association’s Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C. in March, the newly-appointed FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said that he intended to build on the accomplishments of past FTC chairs and that there
would be continuity in enforcement.
The pledge for continuity was reiterated by Leibowitz in September at Fordham University’s annual conference on international antitrust law and policy. At that time, however, Leibowitz said that in addition to continuity, there would be change.
Merger Enforcement
There was continuity in merger enforcement. The agency wrapped up its challenge to specialty grocer Whole Foods Market, Inc.’s acquisition of rival Wild Oats Markets, Inc. in March 2009. The case was originally filed in 2007, when the parties announced their intention to merge.
In addition, the FTC approved two major mergers in the pharmaceutical industry. In October, the FTC conditionally approved Pfizer, Inc.’s proposed $68 billion acquisition of Wyeth, and Schering-Plough Corporation was permitted to proceed with its proposed $41.1 billion acquisition of Merck & Co. Inc. Outside the pharmaceuticals sector, the FTC approved the combination of Japanese consumer electronics makers Panasonic Corporation and Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.
Administrative challenges also led parties to abandon mergers in 2009. The agency blocked the combination of providers of drycast hardscape sold at home improvement centers.
Two mergers in the health care area were abandoned. CSL Limited’s proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corporation was called off after the agency challenged the deal on the ground that it would substantially reduce competition in the U.S. markets for plasma-derivative protein therapies. And Thoratec Corporation abandoned its proposed $282 million acquisition of rival HeartWare International, Inc., after the FTC charged that the transaction would substantially reduce competition for left ventricular
devices.
Also in the health care area, Southwest Virginia’s dominant hospital system agreed to settle an FTC challenge to its 2008 acquisition of an outpatient imaging center and an outpatient surgical center.
Monopolization, Unfair Methods of Competition
In discussing change at the FTC in his Fordham address, Leibowitz talked about challenging monopolization and expanding the agency’s use of its authority to prohibit unfair methods of competition under the FTC Act.
The agency’s December complaint against computer chip maker Intel Corporation for monopolization can be seen as an example of change at the agency.
The FTC announced on December 16 that it had issued an administrative complaint against Intel for monopolizing the markets for central processing units and creating a monopoly in the markets for graphics processing units. The vote to issue the complaint was 3-0, with Commissioner William E. Kovacic recused.
Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch issued a separate statement, in which he concurred in part and dissented in part. Commissioner Rosch said that he concurred in the issuance of a complaint based on pure FTC Act, Section 5 claims, but dissented on public policy grounds to the extent the complaint contained Sherman Act, Section 2 ‘‘tag-along’’ claims.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment